Sunday, April 13, 2008

How the First Earth Day Came About


By Senator Gaylord Nelson, Founder of Earth Day

What was the purpose of Earth Day? How did it start? These are the questions I am most frequently asked.

Actually, the idea for Earth Day evolved over a period of seven years starting in 1962. For several years, it had been troubling me that the state of our environment was simply a non-issue in the politics of the country. Finally, in November 1962, an idea occurred to me that was, I thought, a virtual cinch to put the environment into the political "limelight" once and for all. The idea was to persuade President Kennedy to give visibility to this issue by going on a national conservation tour. I flew to Washington to discuss the proposal with Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who liked the idea. So did the President. The President began his five-day, eleven-state conservation tour in September 1963. For many reasons the tour did not succeed in putting the issue onto the national political agenda. However, it was the germ of the idea that ultimately flowered into Earth Day.

I continued to speak on environmental issues to a variety of audiences in some twenty-five states. All across the country, evidence of environmental degradation was appearing everywhere, and everyone noticed except the political establishment. The environmental issue simply was not to be found on the nation's political agenda. The people were concerned, but the politicians were not.

After President Kennedy's tour, I still hoped for some idea that would thrust the environment into the political mainstream. Six years would pass before the idea that became Earth Day occurred to me while on a conservation speaking tour out West in the summer of 1969. At the time, anti-Vietnam War demonstrations, called "teach-ins," had spread to college campuses all across the nation. Suddenly, the idea occurred to me - why not organize a huge grassroots protest over what was happening to our environment?

I was satisfied that if we could tap into the environmental concerns of the general public and infuse the student anti-war energy into the environmental cause, we could generate a demonstration that would force this issue onto the political agenda. It was a big gamble, but worth a try.

At a conference in Seattle in September 1969, I announced that in the spring of 1970 there would be a nationwide grassroots demonstration on behalf of the environment and invited everyone to participate. The wire services carried the story from coast to coast. The response was electric. It took off like gangbusters. Telegrams, letters, and telephone inquiries poured in from all across the country. The American people finally had a forum to express its concern about what was happening to the land, rivers, lakes, and air - and they did so with spectacular exuberance. For the next four months, two members of my Senate staff, Linda Billings and John Heritage, managed Earth Day affairs out of my Senate office.

Five months before Earth Day, on Sunday, November 30, 1969, The New York Times carried a lengthy article by Gladwin Hill reporting on the astonishing proliferation of environmental events:

"Rising concern about the environmental crisis is sweeping the nation's campuses with an intensity that may be on its way to eclipsing student discontent over the war in Vietnam...a national day of observance of environmental problems...is being planned for next spring...when a nationwide environmental 'teach-in'...coordinated from the office of Senator Gaylord Nelson is planned...."

It was obvious that we were headed for a spectacular success on Earth Day. It was also obvious that grassroots activities had ballooned beyond the capacity of my U.S. Senate office staff to keep up with the telephone calls, paper work, inquiries, etc. In mid-January, three months before Earth Day, John Gardner, Founder of Common Cause, provided temporary space for a Washington, D.C. headquarters. I staffed the office with college students and selected Denis Hayes as coordinator of activities.

Earth Day worked because of the spontaneous response at the grassroots level. We had neither the time nor resources to organize 20 million demonstrators and the thousands of schools and local communities that participated. That was the remarkable thing about Earth Day. It organized itself.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Lois Marie Gibbs (born 1952) is an American environmental activist.

Gibbs's involvement in environmental causes began in 1978 when she discovered that her 7-year-old son's elementary school in Niagara Falls, New York was built on a toxic waste dump and that frightened for the reason that anything can happen at any time. Subsequent investigation revealed that her entire neighborhood , Love Canal, had been built on top of this dump. With no prior experience in community activism, Gibbs organized her neighbors and formed the Love Canal Homeowners Association. She led her community in a battle against the local, state, and federal governments. After years of struggle, 833 families were eventually evacuated, and cleanup of Love Canal began. National press coverage made Lois Gibbs a household name. Her efforts also led to the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "Superfund," which is used to locate and clean up toxic sites throughout the United States.

In 1980, Gibbs formed the Citizens' Clearinghouse for Hazardous Waste, later renamed the Center for Health, Environment and Justice. CHEJ is a grassroots environmental crisis center that provides information, resources, technical assistance and training to community groups around the nation. CHEJ seeks to form strong local organizations in order to protect neighborhoods from exposure to hazardous wastes.

Gibbs has authored several books about the Love Canal story and the effects of toxic waste. Her story was dramatized in the 1982 made-for-tv movie "Lois Gibbs: the Love Canal Story", in which she was played by Marsha Mason. In 2006 Lois Gibbs was awarded an Honorary Degree: Doctor of Humane Letters from Haverford College for her work as an Environmental Activist.
LaDuke was born in Los Angeles, California to Vincent and Betty LaDuke. Her father was part Anishinaabe (Ojibwe or "Chippewa") from an Indian reservation of Minnesota. He was an actor with supporting roles in Western movies, an activist, a writer, and at the end of his life, a spiritual guru under the name Sun Bear.Her mother was a Jewish artist, employed as an art professor at Southern Oregon University in Ashland, Oregon. LaDuke is the mother of five.

LaDuke was raised in Ashland,but after graduating from Harvard in 1982 with a degree in rural economic development, she accepted a job as principal of the high school on the Ojibwe White Earth Indian Reservation in Minnesota. She soon became an activist, involved in the struggle to recover lands promised to the Ojibwe by an 1867 treaty. She helped the Ojibwe buy back thousands of acres of ancestral land.

She worked with Women of All Red Nations to publicize the alarmingly high level of forced sterilization among Native American women.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

World Water Day

The international observance of World Water Day is an initiative that grew out of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro. The United Nations General Assembly designated 22 March of each year as the World Day for Water by adopting a resolution.

This world day for water was to be observed starting in 1993, in conformity with the recommendations of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development contained in chapter 18 (Fresh Water Resources) of Agenda 21.

States were invited to devote the Day to implement the UN recommendations and set up concrete activities as deemed appropriate in the national context. The Subcommittee welcomes the assistance offered by IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre to contribute to an information network centre in support of the observance of the Day by Governments, as required.

http://www.worldwaterday.org/

Environmental Defence

Environmental Defence protects the environment and human health. We research solutions. We educate. We go to court when we have to. All in order to ensure clean air, clean water and thriving ecosystems nationwide, and to bring a halt to Canada’s contribution to climate change.

http://www.environmentaldefence.ca/

Canada - Green Drinks

Go to this website to find out where you can meet up with other people just like you who like to talk about the environment.

Canada is a 2005 entrant to the world of Green Drinks.

http://www.biothinking.com/greendrinks/index.php?country=Canada&city=Canada

Toronto - Environmental Dream House

http://www.thestar.com/SpecialSections/EarthHour/article/308450

Friday, February 29, 2008

SHINE ON....


It is when the night is darkest that the stars shine most brightly... a further challenge remains, the one Martin Luther King characterized as the need to...

Only then can we truly learn. Socrates should have written comics. ... our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. ...

-Martin Luther King, Jr. "Love is the light that dissolves all walls ..... and never fear the darkness, for that is when the stars shine the brightest. ...

Martin Luther King. Peace is not the absence of conflict, ... and don't worry about the darkness, for that is when the stars shine brightest. ...

Only when we are no longer afraid do we begin to live. .... Martin Luther King, Jr.:. An individual has not started living until he can rise above the ..

I have wished to know why the stars shine. ..... Martin Luther King, Jr.:. Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into friend. ...

Martin Luther King Jr. You cannot control what happens to you, ... while a pessimist sees only the red stoplight... The truly wise person is color- blind. ...

Friday, February 22, 2008

Declaration of Interdependence

THIS WE KNOW

We are the earth, through the plants and animals that nourish us.
We are the rains and the oceans that flow through our veins.
We are the breath of the forests of the land, and the plants of the sea.
We are human animals, related to all other life as descendants of the firstborn cell.
We share with these kin a common history, written in our genes.
We share a common present, filled with uncertainty.
And we share a common future, as yet untold.
We humans are but one of thirty million species
weaving the thin layer of life enveloping the world.
The stability of communities of living things depends upon this diversity.
Linked in that web, we are interconnected—
using, cleansing, sharing and replenishing the fundamental elements of life.
Our home, planet Earth, is finite; all life shares its resources and the energy from the sun,and therefore has limits to growth.
For the first time, we have touched those limits.
When we compromise the air, the water, the soil and the variety of life,
we steal from the endless future to serve the fleeting present.

THIS WE BELIEVE
Humans have become so numerous and our tools so powerful
that we have driven fellow creatures to extinction, dammed the great rivers,
torn down ancient forests, poisoned the earth, rain and wind, and ripped holes in the sky.
Our science has brought pain as well as joy; our comfort is paid for by the suffering of millions.
We are learning from our mistakes, we are mourning our vanished kin,
and we now build a new politics of hope.
We respect and uphold the absolute need for clean air, water and soil.
We see that economic activities that benefit the few while shrinking the inheritance of many are wrong.
And since environmental degradation erodes biological capital forever,
full ecological and social cost must enter all equations of development.
We are one brief generation in the long march of time; the future is not ours to erase.
So where knowledge is limited, we will remember all those who will walk after us, and err on the side of caution.

THIS WE RESOLVE
All this that we know and believe must now become the foundation of the way we live.
At this turning point in our relationship with Earth,
we work for an evolution: from dominance to partnership;
from fragmentation to connection; from insecurity,
to interdependence.

THE DAVID SUZUKI FOUNDATION
Suite 219, 2211 West 4th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C., Canada v6k 4s2 · Telephone: (604) 732-4228 · Fax: (604) 732-0752

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Public Access versus Private Feudal Road Feb 16/08

Dear Editor,

Citizens and business owners have questions regarding the feudal arrogance of the Ambassador Bridge Company’s arbitrary closure of the northbound Huron Church Road access for our U.S. customers and visitors:

How is it allowable for a private company to arbitrarily re-direct public traffic? How can this be done without any notice or even city approval let alone Transport Canada’s approval?

As business owners we obviously favour private enterprise, but at what point does private enterprise undermine the public good?

How can such a crucial public artery remain under private, unaccountable ownership and control?

This week it was the unilateral closure of the Huron Church Road access; what if tomorrow the Ambassador Bridge Company finds it in their interest to restrict traffic to cars only or to trucks only or to their private company trucks only? What if the Ambassador Bridge Company finds it more expedient or profitable to sell the steel bridge for scrap on the global market?

Is there nothing in place to stop the Ambassador Bridge Company except trust? Has the Ambassador Bridge Company again proven itself unworthy of the public trust? What happened to Bill C-3? And speaking o Bill C-3… why does it not mention anything about improving the environment so that it will be safe for citizens to live, work and breathe?

If this road closure was a simple faux pas by the Ambassador Bridge Company, how much more damage will the next faux pas create? Will the next arbitrary decision hurt you, the reader, or your employer or your business? Can Windsor businesses, downtown and Olde Sandwich Towne and elsewhere, withstand more arbitrary, unaccountable Ambassador Bridge Company behaviour?

How does the Ambassador Bridge Company propose to compensate businesses that have lost customers because of this faux pas? Surely a public body would be held financially responsible if the roles were reversed. How can the Ambassador Bridge Company repair the “never again” experience of the tourist who gets lost trying to find Sandwich Town businesses via College Avenue? How can the Ambassador Bridge Company repair the “its-not-worth-it” experience of the tourist who gets lost trying to find our prized riverfront via College Avenue? How many more tourists can Windsor afford to leave with a negative experience?

How does the Ambassador Bridge Company propose to compensate homeowners on California, Randolph, Bridge, McKay, Campbell and other residential streets for the increased traffic from people trying to find the river, downtown, Sandwich Towne or the University?

More questions were raised as we question arbitrary, unaccountable behaviours by the Ambassador Bridge Company:
Why does every bridge crossing the Niagara River only cost $3.25 for a round trip when we are forced to pay $8.00 for a round trip to Detroit?

Why can the Niagara area receive millions of dollars per year in local “impact area” improvements from the bridges and we do not? Why can the Ambassador Bridge Company allow its many rental properties to become unsafe eye sores when any other property owner would have to endure endless visits/fines from the property bylaw enforcement officers of the city? Why is the city council afraid of a law suit every time it even thinks about keeping the Ambassador Bridge Company accountable? Why is the Ambassador Bridge Company pushing to proceed with a second span when it agreed in writing to not twin the bridge at the time it received city cooperation in expanding six truck lanes west of Huron Church Road? What is the difference between a “twin” and an “enhancement”? Why can the private bridge company put up traffic lights over public roadways without consultation or permit? Why doesn’t the Ambassador Bridge pay property tax to the city for the bridge asset when every other business or factory or homeowner pays property tax?

Regarding noise levels, why can’t the Ambassador Bridge Company be a good neighbour like the Bluewater Bridge and at least put up signs asking trucks to not use ‘compression brakes’?

Why does the media leave Ambassador Bridge Company officials unquestioned when they push for City Council to be more open (read legally exposed) when every price increase or decision by the Ambassador Bridge Company happens behind solidly closed doors?

Is it time to end feudalism (again)?

Mike Cardinal

On behalf of Olde Sandwich Towne business and home owners